Legal Opinion

Lester Paul Brown v. Warden, Great Meadow Correctional Facility

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 23, 1982No. 993, Docket 81-2363PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Circuit Judge:

In the absence of any indications to the contrary, a defendant charged with criminal behavior is presumed to be mentally competent to stand trial. However, once a defendant’s competency has been called into question, either by the defendant or the prosecution expressly raising the issue, or through the presence of “warning signals” which cause the court to raise the question sua sponte, the burden is placed on the prosecution to prove that the defendant is mentally competent to stand trial. 1 In this petition for a writ of habeas corpus the petitioner-appellant contends…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Terry Allen Bouchillon v. James A. Collins, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. PruittOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Buttrum v. BlackDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
  5. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API