Legal Opinion

Rajhel v. Automobile Club Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1985No. Docket 74121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff was unable to start her car and called a tow truck. When the tow truck arrived, she left her car and walked towards it. As plaintiff approached the tow truck, she slipped on a patch of ice and injured herself. Plaintiff then brought this suit seeking recovery of no-fault benefits from her insurer. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and this Court granted leave to appeal.

When denying defendant’s motion, the lower court found that plaintiff was an occupant of the motor vehicle and that there was a causal connec*595tion between her injury and the ownership,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Block v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. King v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Denning v. Farm Bureau Insurance GroupMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Griffin v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Putkamer v. Transamerica Insurance Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Marklund v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Daubenspeck v. Auto Club of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Karen Louise Bellmore v. Friendly Oil Change IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Rajhel v. Automobile Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API