Lenkiewicz v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
Before us is the question of what constitutes a “gratuity” for the purpose of computing workmen’s compensation benefits.
In 1971, while working as a waitress for The Pittsburgh Press Club (Employer/Bespondent), Loretta Lenkiewicz (Petitioner) was seriously injured and rendered totally disabled. A compensation agreement was voluntarily executed providing Petitioner with weekly compensation based on her average weekly wage plus a two dollar daily gratuity allowance.1 Petitioner alleging that her average weekly wage was understated, petitioned for a modification of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DeWanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- DAUGHERTY v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO., I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Daugherty v. Continental Can Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- McGlasson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BulickiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Cohen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- McGlasson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- McGlasson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989