Legal Opinion

Lenkiewicz v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1681 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Before us is the question of what constitutes a “gratuity” for the purpose of computing workmen’s compensation benefits.

In 1971, while working as a waitress for The Pittsburgh Press Club (Employer/Bespondent), Loretta Lenkiewicz (Petitioner) was seriously injured and rendered totally disabled. A compensation agreement was voluntarily executed providing Petitioner with weekly compensation based on her average weekly wage plus a two dollar daily gratuity allowance.1 Petitioner alleging that her average weekly wage was understated, petitioned for a modification of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DeWanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. DAUGHERTY v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO., I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Daugherty v. Continental Can Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McGlasson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. BulickiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Cohen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. McGlasson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. McGlasson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API