Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bulicki

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1986No. 1355PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Appellant, Mathew Bulicki, was found guilty of loitering and prowling at nighttime, pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5506,1 in a jury trial before the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County. Appellant thereafter filed post-verdict motions, which the trial court denied. The Honorable Joseph H. Stanziani subsequently sentenced appellant to six to twelve months’ imprisonment. This appeal followed.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the legal definition of nighttime; (2) whether the jury’s verdict was contrary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. DeWanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth v. KiddSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. State v. BillingsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. State v. HammondsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SewellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. MelnyczenkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. MelnyczenkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API