Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. Continental Can Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1973No. Appeals, Nos. 315 and 316PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

This is an appeal from orders granting a compulsory nonsuit in two assumpsit actions. Appellants (plaintiffs below) are fifty-seven men a.nd women who were employed by appellee, the Continental Can Co., *344Inc. (hereinafter “Continental”), at its Hazel-Atlas Glass Division in Washington, Pennsylvania, from May 1962 until February 1964, when Continental sold its business. Appellants are seeking back wages, an equal amount in liquidated damages, and other sums allegedly due them under the Equal Pay Law, Act of Dec. 17, 1959, P. L. 1913, §1, 43 P.S. §336.1 et seq., as amended…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. MoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Hochgertel v. Canada Dry Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Ogilvie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Shultz v. First Victoria National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hellertown Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. BaroneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Lower Merion Fraternal Order of Police Lodge Number Twenty-Eight v. Township of Lower MerionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. RutanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API