Legal Opinion

Brumfield v. Cain

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 2015No. 13–1433PublishedCited by 361 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sotomayor

In Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 , 122 S.Ct. 2242 , 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), this Court recognized that the execution of the intellectually disabled contravenes the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. After Atkins was decided, petitioner, a Louisiana death-row inmate, requested an opportunity to prove he was intellectually disabled in state court. Without affording him an evidentiary hearing or granting him time or funding to secure expert evidence, the state court rejected petitioner's claim. That decision, we hold, was "based on an unreasonable determination of…

Also in this document: Dissent · Thomas; Dissent · Alito.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by361 opinions

  1. Ledford v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Moore v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Linda Stermer v. Millicent WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. Brendan Dassey v. Michael DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Daniel v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

356 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API