Legal Opinion

United States v. Cornell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 14, 1980No. 35,375; SPCM 12783PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COOK, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, appellant stands convicted, by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial, of the transfer of phencyclidine and the sale of marihuana, in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 934, respectively. We granted review to determine whether court-martial jurisdiction was properly exercised over the charge involving the sale of marihuana.*

Appellant asserted at trial that the offense was not service connected; thus, the court-martial had no jurisdiction over it. See Relford v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. AlefUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. StrangstalienUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. CarrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. BrauchlerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. LoweryU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. HardenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. BartonU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API