Legal Opinion

United States v. Harden

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided August 13, 1982No. ACM 23463PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HEMINGWAY, Judge:

In a general court-martial, tried before military judge alone, the accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of larceny, conspiracy, forgery and receiving stolen property, in violation of Articles 121, 81, 123, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 881, 923, 934. He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three years and forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

The accused asserts error in the admission of testimony by a handwriting expert, lack of subject matter jurisdiction over a forgery offense, and the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. StrangstalienUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. CollierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. KentU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. LloydUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. LecappelainU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  2. United States v. ThompsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. ThebergeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API