Legal Opinion

Williams v. Porter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1947No. 15747PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

Counsel for all the parties treat the trust sought to be alleged as a resulting trust and not a constructive trust. It will be so dealt with here.

The main insistence of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the petition failed to state a cause of action because it failed to allege that the “purchase-money was paid either before or at the time of the purchase.” In support of this contention counsel cite Hall v. Edwards, 140 Ga. 765 (79 S. E. 852), Houston v. Farley, 146 Ga. 822, 824 (92 S. E. 635), and Gales v. Stokeley, 151 Ga. 718 (108 S. E. 34).

The point raised has been…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Toler v. GoodinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. MacKler v. LahmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Hall v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Hemphill v. HemphillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Loggins v. DavesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American Thread Co. v. RochesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Bullard v. BullardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  4. Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Jackson v. FaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API