Legal Opinion

Rittenhouse v. Tabor Grain Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 20, 1990No. 4-86-0486PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE KNECHT

delivered the opinion of the court:

This property damage action arose from the collapse of a bin at a grain storage facility in Long Point, Illinois. At trial, the circuit court erroneously directed verdicts thereby tainting the subsequent jury verdicts in the action. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Following the collapse of a grain bin onto his property, Paul Rittenhouse, Jr. (Rittenhouse), filed a damage action against Tabor Grain Company (Tabor) and Long Point Grain and Supply Company, Inc. (Long Point), the respective operator…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tzystuck v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Sunstream Jet Express, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. International Air Service Co., Ltd., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Dyback v. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gambino v. Boulevard Mortgage Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Quality Lighting, Inc. v. BenjaminAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Ceres Terminals, Inc. v. Chicago City Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. In Re Vic Supply Company, Inc., Debtor. Falconbridge U.S., Inc. v. Bank One Illinois, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Tucker v. Illinois Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API