Legal Opinion
Cates v. Haderlein
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 23, 1951No. 10312PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Circuit Judge.
In this action plaintiff seeks to restrain and enjoin the postmaster of the city of Chicago from carrying out the terms of a Fraud Order issued by the Postmaster General after a hearing. The district court denied the plaintiff’s motions for a preliminary injunction and for a permanent injunction, and dismissed the complaint.
In the complaint herein plaintiff described in detail the administrative procedure of the Post Office Department with reference to the hearing before that agency which led to the issuance of the Fraud Order. Appellant, trading as Glory Bee Products and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tollett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Door v. Donaldson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Gottlieb v. SchafferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Carl Brandenfels v. J. Edward Day, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Klaytan W. Kirby v. Leslie N. Shaw, Individually and as Post-Master of the City of Los Angeles, State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.