Legal Opinion

Harrel v. Hide & Leather National Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1894No. 1236PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Williamson.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

The parties have made an agreed statement of the facts and the question of law involved in this appeal, as follows:

“That on the 28th day of November, 1889, appellants were indebted to the C. J. L. Meyer & Sons Co. in the sum of $1026.67, and on said day made out and sent to said company their accepted draft in the following words:
“‘$1026.67.
“ ‘Georgetown, Texas, 11/28, 1889.
“ ‘Four months after date, pay to the order of ourselves one thousand, twenty-six and 76/100 dollars, and charge same to the account of

íí Í__

“ ‘To Messrs. Whittle & Harrel, Georgetown, Texas.’
“And…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Violett v. PattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Huntington v. Branch Bank at MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Connor v. Uvalde Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. CatorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Connor v. Uvalde Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API