Legal Opinion

Connor v. Uvalde Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1913Published

Appeal from Uvalde County Court; J. F. Robinson, Judge. Action by the Uvalde National Bank against M. Connor and others. From a judgment entered on a verdict directed for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

The Uvalde National Bank sued F. E. Seawell, M. Connor, and J. J. H. Patterson upon a promissory note for $815, alleging that the note was a joint and several obligation, and that Connor’s name was signed thereto by Seawell, who was duly authorized to sign said Connor’s name thereto. Connor filed a plea of non est factum, a general demurrer, and general denial. Patterson admitted the execution of the note and prayed for judgment over against Seawell for any amount he might have to pay, and also for contribution over against Connor. Connor also filed a plea for judgment against Patterson for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harfst v. State Bank of El CampoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Tompkins MacHinery & Implement Co. v. Peter & SherrillTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Neil v. ShackelfordTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Garlitz v. Runnels County Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Anderson v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API