Legal Opinion

State v. Jensen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2011No. 25833PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] William Jensen was charged with fourth offense driving under the influence. He filed a motion to strike one of his three prior driving under the influence convictions. Jensen argued that because the magistrate court relied on a statement-of-rights form to establish the voluntariness of his guilty plea, that prior conviction is invalid for sentence-enhancement purposes. The trial court denied Jensen’s motion to strike, concluding that the statement-of-rights form was an adequate record of voluntariness. We affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] On April 2, 2010, Rapid City Police…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Gene M. Dunn, Jr. v. Ron Simmons, Chairman, Parole Board, Corrections Cabinet, and David L. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BilbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. EdwardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. BurkettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. CeplechaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API