State v. Jensen
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] William Jensen was charged with fourth offense driving under the influence. He filed a motion to strike one of his three prior driving under the influence convictions. Jensen argued that because the magistrate court relied on a statement-of-rights form to establish the voluntariness of his guilty plea, that prior conviction is invalid for sentence-enhancement purposes. The trial court denied Jensen’s motion to strike, concluding that the statement-of-rights form was an adequate record of voluntariness. We affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] On April 2, 2010, Rapid City Police…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gene M. Dunn, Jr. v. Ron Simmons, Chairman, Parole Board, Corrections Cabinet, and David L. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BilbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. EdwardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BurkettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. CeplechaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.