Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. Hawk
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1996No. 94-CV-1493PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Senior Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment by the trial court directing a verdict in favor of *459appellees after appellant had presented his evidence in support of his complaint. Appellant alleged that as a consequence of appel-lees’ negligence, he had suffered a severe injury in August 1991, from burns he received on premises they variously owned and leased.1 Upon review of this record we cannot conclude that there are “absolutely no facts or circumstances from which a jury could reasonably find negligence,” see District of Columbia v. Smith, 642 A.2d 140, 141 (D.C.1994). Accordingly,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- District of Columbia v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Corley v. BP Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hughes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Remeikis v. Boss & Phelps, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Wagshal v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Briggs v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hill v. Metropolitan African Methodist Episcopal ChurchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. FergusonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Wise v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.