United States v. Joe Hernandez-Arias
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD.
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 21, 2014 is hereby amended as follows:
Following page 12, first full paragraph, the following footnote is appended:
3Our review in this case is confined to the operation of IRCA and its unique implementing regulations. Our disposition of this case does not contradict Hing Sum v. Holder, 602 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir.2010), which holds that the word “admission,” either at the border or through adjustment of status or some other administrative process, generally refers to a procedural…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Isidro Ubaldo-FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Hing Sum v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Isaac RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Angel Posos-Sanchez v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Samuel Gomez v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Juan Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- FAJARDO ESPINOZABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
- Silvano Lopez-Angel v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.