Legal Opinion
FAJARDO ESPINOZA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2015No. ID 3840PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 603
(BIA 2015) Interim Decision #3840 Matter of Mario A. FAJARDO ESPINOZA, Respondent Decided June 8, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A grant of Family Unity Program benefits does not constitute an “admission” to the United States under section 101(a)(13)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(13)(A) (2012), for purposes of establishing that an alien has accrued the requisite 7 years of continuous residence after having been “admitted in any status” to be eligible for cancellation of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grace v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jose Sanchez v. Secretary United States DepartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- H-G-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- FLORES-ABARCABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
- Ramiro Tula Rubio v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.