Legal Opinion
United States v. Gary Bennett
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 14, 1992No. 90-3128PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Chief Judge.
This case arises from a scheme by Gary Bennett to defraud purchasers by rolling back the odometers in the cars he sold to them. The odometers were altered to qualify the cars for Chrysler Corporation’s extended warranty. As part of a plea agreement, Bennett pleaded guilty to two counts of mail fraud. The essence of those counts was that Bennett used the mail to transmit an Application for Title/Registration to two customers which reflected false and fraudulent information regarding the odometer reading of the automobiles sold to those customers. Although only two counts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Maurice DaviesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Sidney D. FurstCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Frasiel L. HugheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. Barbara ChaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- United States v. Robert Earl Stouffer, and James Dale AtchleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. William H. RandleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. HensleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.