Legal Opinion
United States v. William H. Randle
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 1, 2003No. 02-1828PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
William H. Randle appeals that aspect of his sentence ordering restitution to three victims of his fraudulent bankruptcy scheme. Because we find that the district court was without statutory authority to order restitution with respect to two of the victims, we vacate that portion of the restitution ordered and remand the case for resentencing.
I. HISTORY
The sentence at issue in this appeal was imposed pursuant to Randle’s conviction on one count of bankruptcy fraud. This fraud was perpetrated as part of a scheme in which Randle would approach homeowners facing foreclosure…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Michael Leroy Barnes, and Cheryl BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. John NobleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. HensleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. Marvis H. BownesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Robert S. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. WebberCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Fayez AlburayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. MaturinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.