Legal Opinion
Anderson v. International Harvester Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 1, 1921No. 12255PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Complaint; from Ben Hill superior court — Judge Gower. February 5, 1931.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
Under the rule stated in Pryor v. Ludden & Bates, 134 Ga. 288 (67 S. E. 654, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 267), a plea setting up a breach of an oral warranty can be maintained in a suit on a purchase-money note which, though reciting the consideration, fails to integrate within itself the terms of the sale agreement; but where the note sued on recites that, “ in consideration of such renewal and extension of time of payment, I hereby expressly waive all claims arising out of the purchase of said property, and all defenses, statutory or otherwise, to the payment hereof,” this provision of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music HouseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Bond & Maxwell v. PerrinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BroachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Atlanta City Street Railway Co. v. American Car Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Lockett v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
3Cited by12 opinions
- Widincamp v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Jones v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Young v. John Deere Plow CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Washington & Lincolnton Railroad v. Southern Iron & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.