Legal Opinion

Pryor v. Ludden & Bates Southern Music House

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1910PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Question of law; from Court of Appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

The Court of Appeals desires the instruction of the Supreme Court as to the following question of law: “Where there is a sale of a specific article of personal property, such as a cer*289tain particular piano, and the purchaser gives to the seller a promissory note stating that the consideration thereof is the particular designated article sold, and the note is otherwise silent as to representations and warranties, is the defendant precluded by what is commonly called the ‘parol-evidence rule,’ or by any other principle of law, from pleading in defense to an action on the note that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Bullard v. BrewerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Moultrie Repair Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Hirsch v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Johnston v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Albany Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Bond & Maxwell v. PerrinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BroachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API