Legal Opinion
Carfora v. Globe, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 26, 1985No. 2876PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendants are appealing from the judgment of the court rendered after a jury verdict and after the court’s denial of the defendants’ post-trial motions to set aside the verdict and to render judgment pursuant to Practice Book § 321. The plaintiff has cross appealed.
The defendants claim as error (1) that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain the verdict for the plaintiff, (2) that the court’s charge to the jury and its recharge were deficient in their explanation of the scope of the duty owed by the defendants to the plaintiff, a licensee, and (3) that the court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. ScielzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. StorlazziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Futterleib v. Mr. Happy's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Dimeo v. Burns, Brooks & McNeil, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Lemonious v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.