Legal Opinion

Kim v. Reilly

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2004No. 24995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C. J.

Defendant-appellant Daniel T. Reilly appeals from the February 14, 2002 order of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, the Honorable Richard W. Pollack presiding, granting plaintiffs-appellees II Nam Kim’s and Yung Ye Lee’s (collectively, the plaintiffs) motion to enforce judgments and/or for writ of execution [hereinafter, motion to enforce]. On appeal, Reilly contends that the circuit court erred in granting the plaintiffs’ motion to enforce their respective judgments because the court refused to apply the covered loss deductible statute, Hawai'i Revised…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First Hawaiian Bank v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Labrador v. Liberty Mutual GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Barbachano v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  4. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. AtcherlyHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. GepayaHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoopai v. Civil Service CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re the Thomas H. Gentry Revocable TrustHawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Weite v. MomoharaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Hoopai v. Civil Service CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API