Legal Opinion

A.I. Root Co. v. Computer Dynamics, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 31, 1985No. C84-1348PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

MANOS, District Judge.

On October 28, 1983, plaintiff, the A.I. Root Company (Root), filed the above-captioned case 1 against the defendants, Computer Dynamics, Inc. (CDI) and Management Assistance, Inc. (MAI). It alleges that CDI and MAI engaged in anti-competitive activity in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § l. 2 Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15. 3 The case is currently before the court on CDI’s and MAI’s motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, their motions are granted.

I

Root is an Ohio corporation that manufactures…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A.I. Root Company v. Computer/dynamics, Inc. And Management Assistance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  3. Kerasotes Michigan Theatres, Inc. v. National Amusements, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  4. Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motor Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Rousey v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API