A.I. Root Co. v. Computer Dynamics, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
On October 28, 1983, plaintiff, the A.I. Root Company (Root), filed the above-captioned case 1 against the defendants, Computer Dynamics, Inc. (CDI) and Management Assistance, Inc. (MAI). It alleges that CDI and MAI engaged in anti-competitive activity in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § l. 2 Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15. 3 The case is currently before the court on CDI’s and MAI’s motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, their motions are granted.
I
Root is an Ohio corporation that manufactures…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- A.I. Root Company v. Computer/dynamics, Inc. And Management Assistance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- Kerasotes Michigan Theatres, Inc. v. National Amusements, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motor Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Rousey v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.