Legal Opinion
Rousey v. United States
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided February 13, 1996No. Civil A. 95-151PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FORESTER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Currently pending before the Court is the United States’ motion for summary judgment. By agreement of the parties, the Court ordered that this action be held in abeyance pending the disposition of this motion. The motion having been fully briefed, it is ripe for review.
II. Background
This litigation stems from the November 9, 1991, shooting in which Robert Daigneau (“Daigneau”) shot and killed four of the six occupants of a 1991 Lincoln Continental owned and operated by Fred Marion Alsman before killing himself. Those killed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- McIntosh v. MilanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1980
- A.I. Root Company v. Computer/dynamics, Inc. And Management Assistance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anna Rousey, Individually and as Administratrix for the Estates of Palmer Lee Rousey and Fred Marion Alsman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997