Legal Opinion

BROSCHART v. HUSQVARNA AB

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 11, 2022No. 3:20-cv-18795Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ROBERT BROSCHART, Plaintilf, Civil Action No. 20-18795 (MAS) (LHG) MEMORANDUM OPINION HUSQVARNA AB et al., Defendants, SHIPP, District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products N.A., Inc. and Husqvarna Professional Products Inc.’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Robert Broschart’s (“Broschart”) Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 20.) Broschart opposed (ECF No. 22), and Defendants replied (ECF No. 23). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court decides…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Karen Malleus v. John GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API