United States v. Rosalind Edith Chandler, United States of America v. Frederick Freeman Leister, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:
En banc hearings were separately held in two cases in order to consider fully the appropriateness of the standards of mental responsibility employed in determining the guilt of defendants charged with crime. In the one case, the Court applied the M’Naghten — irresistible impulse test. In the other, alternative findings were made within the American Law Institute’s recommended formulation and in terms of the M’Naghten and irresistible impulse tests. We affirm the conviction in each instance, for reasons later appearing, but we reject the M’Naghten test.
Chandler
Rosalind…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Charles FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Gerald C. Bolton v. David W. Harris, Acting Superintendent of Saint Elizabeths HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- United States v. Archie W. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- John Joseph Blake v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Graham v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bethea v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.