Legal Opinion

May v. Broun

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1972PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*30HOLMAN, J.

This is an action for damages arising out of alleged negligent acts by defendant doctors while they were performing a hemorrhoidectomy. Prom a judgment of involuntary nonsuit, plaintiff appealed.

One of the defendants was a general practitioner and plaintiff’s regular physician. He associated the other defendant, a surgeon, for the purpose of performing the operation while he assisted.

As part of the operative procedure, an electrical instrument was used to cauterize blood vessels. This machine, which sat about six feet from the operating table, was connected by a cord to a small…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hungerford v. Portland Sanitarium & Benevolent Ass'n.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Wright v. ConwayWyoming Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cain v. RijkenOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Simpson v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF PROVIDENCE, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Eads v. BormanOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Thomas v. Raleigh General HospitalWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API