Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Mendola

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 24, 2012PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ASHRAFI, J.A.D.

The precise and limited issue we decide is whether a claimant must present expert testimony to support her causes of action against several defendants in the automotive business for damages sustained when the engine of her leased automobile seized. Third-party plaintiff Patricia Mendola appeals from orders granting summary judgment to third-party defendants because she did not produce a report of an expert witness by the close of discovery. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

Viewed most favorably to appellant Mendola, see R.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Wayne Davis v. Brickman Landscaping (071310)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. Mendez v. ShahDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
  3. Kuzian v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
  4. E & H Steel Corp. v. PSEG Fossil, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. Mendez v. ShahDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API