Legal Opinion

Fava v. Pfahnl

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1958No. Civ. 17402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McMURRAY, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiff sued defendant for injuries sustained by her while riding in a car her husband was driving. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant and this appeal is from the judgment upon such verdict.

Viewing the evidence, as we must, with all intendments in favor of respondent, it appears that respondent was proceeding northbound in the fast lane of a divided highway with four lanes northbound at 50 miles per hour; appellant’s husband was driving the car in which she was riding in the lane immediately to the right of respondent and was travelling “behind”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carlson, Collins, Gordon & Bold v. BanducciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API