Legal Opinion

Carter v. South Central Bell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1990No. 88-3777PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

Mary H. Carter, Tahnella Jackson, and Lemore Allen appeal a judgment of a United States Magistrate dismissing their claims of racial discrimination by their former employer, South Central Bell Telephone Company (SCB). Because they have not stated a claim under section 1981 of title forty-two, we AFFIRM the dismissal.

The appellants also have asked us to consider their claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1981 & Supp. 1990). Carter and Jackson never pled Title VII at trial, and we refuse to consider that…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. United States v. Hosvaldo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Daniel Anderson, Jr. v. Douglas & Lomason Co., Inc., Douglas & Lomason Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Thomas Johnson v. Uncle Ben's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Emma S. Vaughn v. Robert Edel, Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API