United States Ex Rel. Paranich v. Sorgnard
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CONNER, District Judge.
Presently before the court is defendant Irwin Leasing Corporation’s (“Irwin”) motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 125). This is a qui tam 1 action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. (“the Act”). Qui tam plaintiff, 2 Steven Paranich (“Paranich”), contends that Irwin induced him to file false Medicare reimbursement claims for treatments using a medical device called the Matrix. Irwin denies any liability for plaintiffs Medicare claims, and asserts that, even if it is liable, Paranich is not a proper relator under the Act. Irwin also asserts via…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Stephen Paranich, D.C. v. SorgnardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Rupert Ex Rel. Estate of Knepp v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- United States v. SorgnardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005