Legal Opinion

United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility District

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 15, 1951No. Civ. 1247PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYankwich, District Judge

(after stating the facts as -above.)

The making of this motion is an opportune moment to state for the record certain matters as they appear from the files of this court. I am doing this as a judge o'f this court, because, despite the fact that Judge Weinberger is designated to sit in the Southern Division, the Southern Division is a part of the Southern District of California.. There is one other matter that makes me speak, and that is this: It has become quite evident that if this case is tried, it will require the entire time of one judge. It will, therefore, be necessary for some pf us to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  3. People of the State of California v. United States of America, Santa Margarita Mutual Water Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. United States v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. Island Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API