Legal Opinion

Arndt v. UBS AG

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 1, 2004No. 04-CV-751PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action against defendant UBS AG (“UBS” or “Defendant”) for an accounting, imposition of a constructive trust, fraud, misrepresentation, spoliation of evidence, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs name the United States as a party to this case in an effort to obtain certain documents from the Government to support its claims against UBS. In sum, Plaintiffs contend that UBS, as a successor-in- interest to I.G. Farben (“Farben”), a German company which profited during the Nazi regime, failed to turn over assets which rightfully belong…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Shipping Financial Services Corporation v. William J. Drakos, Duke Petroleum Transport Corporation and Omi Petrolink CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sikhs for Justice v. NathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Mujica v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2005
  3. In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Jerez v. Republic of CubaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API