Disciplinary Counsel v. Yurich

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 315.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. YURICH. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Yurich,

1997-Ohio-239.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Knowingly revealing secrets or confidences of a client—Using confidences or secrets of a client to the advantage of oneself without the client’s consent—False, fraudulent, misleading, deceptive, self-laudatory, or unfair statements—Direct mail solicitation not containing disclosures mandated by the Disciplinary Rules. (No. 96-2433—Submitted January 22, 1997—Decided April…