Legal Opinion

Bowman v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 30, 2007No. 1:06 CV 1323PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SOLOMON OLIVER, Jr., District Judge.

Pending before the court is Defendants United States of America, et al. (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 12.) For the foregoing reasons, the Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss is denied, and the Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion is granted.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 23, 1992, Congress passed Pub.L. 102-484, codified in 10 U.S.C. § 1143a,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Casciani v. NesbittDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
  3. Linden Bowman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API