Legal Opinion
Hanna Mining Co. v. Minnesota Power and Light Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 24, 1983No. Civ. 5-82-307PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MILES W. LORD, Chief Judge.
Defendant Minnesota Power and Light Company moves to dismiss this breach of contract action for, inter alia, lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A magistrate acting pursuant to the special assignment provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) issued a memorandum recommending the motion be granted. This court, after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings, adopts the recommendation to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction but follows a different analysis 'than that of the magistrate.
Plaintiff Hanna Mining Company manages the Butler…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ed Freeman and Wife Sharon Freeman, Cross-Appellants v. Northwest Acceptance Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Taber Partners, I v. Merit Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Keesecker v. BirdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Aberman v. Malden Mills Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Cinema North Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. Plaza at Latham Associates and Hoyt's Cinema Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.