Legal Opinion

Hazel Gully v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 24, 1985No. 84-1842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Circuit Judge.

In 1978, Hazel Gully acquired a piece of property to which Southwestern Bell Telephone Company had been granted an easement. As provided for in the easement deed, Bell had placed a communications cable at the edge of the property. The cable was in place in 1981 when Gully, who was in the midst of planning to build a commercial office facility on the property, discovered it, together with Bell’s easement. As she was entitled to do under the terms of the easement deed, Gully asked Bell to remove the line. Bell delayed and then refused. Gully sued for declaratory…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. City of Lagrange v. PierattTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. City of Dallas v. PrioloTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. City of Abilene v. Burk Royalty CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation District v. CostelloTexas Supreme Court · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weingarten Realty Investors v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  2. Clare v. Florissant Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Clare v. Florissant Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API