Legal Opinion
Clare v. Florissant Water & Sanitation District
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided July 28, 1994No. 93CA1609PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge JONES.
In this action premised on the theory of inverse condemnation, plaintiff, Harold E. Clare, appeals the summary judgment entered against him and in favor of defendant, Florissant Water and Sanitation District (District). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Clare owned and operated Florissant Water Service, providing water to customers in Florissant, Colorado, and its vicinity. The District is a special district organized in 1980 pursuant to the predecessor statute to the Special District Act, §§ 32-1-101 et seq., C.R.S. (1993 Cum.Supp.). In accordance with §…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Northglenn v. GrynbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Ossman v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Poudre Valley Rural Electric Ass'n v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Water Development Co. v. Board of Water WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- BETHLEHEM EV. LUTH. CHURCH v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1 v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Thompson v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Van Wyk v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- Risen v. Cucharas Sanitation & Water DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Clare v. Florissant Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1994