Dober v. Ukase Investment Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
In order to justify its claim of right to possession of the property sought to be recovered by the plaintiff, the defendant herein asserts that the property was abandoned by the plaintiff.
As applied to property, “abandonment” is- defined by the editors of R. C. L. as follows:
“It means the voluntary relinquishment of the possession of a thing by the owner with the intention of terminating his ownership, but without vesting it in any other person. ” 1 R. C. L., p. 1.
It has often been held that to constitute an abandonment there must be an intention to abandon, and that intention must be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roseburg Nat. Bank v. CampOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Watts v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Huffman v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Stevens v. Town of NorfolkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hull v. CLEMENSOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Rencken v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Rich v. RunyonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Hutchinson v. StricklinOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Ylvich v. KalafateOregon Supreme Court · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.