Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Gray
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 26, 1975No. 74-1830PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.
The question on this appeal is whether petitioner’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination was violated by consolidation of two charged offenses of armed robbery and attempted murder. The district court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, adopting the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s opinion. We affirm.
Petitioner Stuart A. Holmes was charged with armed robbery and attempted murder in violation of sections 943.32(l)(b) and (2), 940.01, and 939.32, Wis.Stats. Separate complaints were originally issued and after preliminary hearings…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Robert G. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Harold S. Cross v. United States of America, John L. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Peter W. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Daniel L. BalzanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek OdonerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. William Clyde LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Kent Thomas L'ALLierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.