Legal Opinion
Leach v. U.S. Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 29, 2007No. Civil Action 07-1399(EGS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
In this habeas corpus action, petitioner, presumably a District of Columbia parolee, challenges the United States Parole Commission’s (“the Commission”) jurisdiction over him. Upon review of a habeas petition, the Court is obligated either to issue the writ or to order respondent to show cause why the writ should not issue “unless it appears from the application that the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Because the application presents no basis for issuing the writ, it will be denied and the case…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Robert Franklin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Johnson, Lamar v. Quander, Paul A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Saunder, Jr. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- McCleod v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Anderson v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Brown v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Conway v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.