Legal Opinion

Tope v. Brattain

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1933No. 24401. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

A. E. C. Macdonald’s execution creditor (A. Tope) purchased, at a sale under his own levy, an automobile on which Macdonald had previously given to Ross R. Brattain a chattel mortgage. Subsequent to Tope’s purchase of the automobile at his own execution sale, judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in an action brought by Brattain against Macdonald to foreclose the chattel mortgage on the automobile. Tope instituted an action to restrain the chattel mortgage foreclosure sale, and prayed that the title in the automobile be quieted in him. The cause was tried to the court, which found…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crompton v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Dame v. C. H. Hanson & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Day v. BassettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Cutting v. WhittemoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  5. In re Russell Falls Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. HambrightWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Snow v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Connell v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API