Legal Opinion
United States v. Corral
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided October 1, 2004No. 5:04-cv-00543PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LORENA CORRAL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS
MARTINEZ, District Judge.
On May 21, 2004 and August 2, 2004, the Court conducted evidentiary hearings in connection with Defendant Lorena Corral’s (“Corral”) “Motion to Suppress” (“Motion”) filed in the above-captioned cause. After considering Corral’s Motion, the Government’s “Amended Response to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence” (“Response”), and the testimony provided on May 21, 2004 and August 2, 2004, the Court concludes that Corral’s Motion should be granted, for the reasons set forth below.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
In the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Frederick Alonzo WallerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. CosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- State v. ShumakerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- United States v. ManafortDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- State v. Dona Nichoeal WestlakeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.