Legal Opinion

United States v. Kimoana

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 15, 2004No. 03-4023PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Fonua Kimoana (“Defendant”) was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) as a felon in possession of a firearm. He now challenges the district court’s refusal to suppress the firearm as evidence. We hold that the entry and resultant search were justified by consent given by “Nick,” a third party with both actual and apparent authority. Alternatively, once the officers’ initial entry into the room was justified by Nick’s consent, the subsequent search was justified by voluntary consent given by Patelo Vake. Accordingly, we exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. United States v. McCaneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Frederick Alonzo WallerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. CosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. GrimmettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API