Legal Opinion

In re Armant

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 19, 2004No. 2004-B-2232PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*769ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

hPER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, William G. Armant, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension.

PRIOR DISCIPLINARY HISTORY

Before we address the current charges, we find it helpful to review respondent’s prior disciplinary and ineligibility history. Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Louisiana in 1992. Three years later, in 1995, respondent was disciplined for the first time, in the form of an admonition…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  2. In re BoohakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API