Legal Opinion
In re Boohaker
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 24, 2006No. 2006-B-0451Published
1Opinion of the Court
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
2Per curiam
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent commingled *269client funds with his own funds and failed to render an accounting to his client. After the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent admitted that his conduct violated Rule 1.15 (safekeeping property of clients or third parties) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted .and that…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Association v. HaylonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. O'HALLORANSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
- Louisiana State Bar Association v. SelenbergSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- In re PatrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- In Re BilbeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.