Legal Opinion

Toledo & Ann Arbor R. R. v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1885PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Monroe. (Joslyn, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOhamplin, J.

This suit was commenced on the 24th day of February, 1879. It was brought to recover as damages the amount agreed to be paid by the terms of the following agreement:

“$100.00. Dundee; Mich., Oct. 4, 1871.

For the purpose of promoting and aiding the construction of the Toledo, Ann Arbor & Northern Railroad, and in consideration of the benefits to be derived therefrom, I do hereby pledge and agree to pay to the order of the Toledo, Ann Arbor & Northern Railroad Company the sum of one hundred dollars, payable in six months after the first cars run over the road from Ann Arbor to Toledo. Payable on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stange v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Toledo & Ann Arbor R. R. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Wilcox v. Toledo & Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Draper v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Cook v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Marion Bond Co. v. Mexican Coffee & Rubber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Harrow Spring Co. v. Whipple Harrow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Sayre v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API