Legal Opinion

Toledo & Ann Arbor R. R. v. Johnson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1882PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Monroe. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s •court upon an instrument of which the following is a copy:

“ Dundee, Michigan, October 4,1877.

Eor the purpose of promoting and aiding the construction of the Toledo, Ann Arbor & Northern Railroad and in ■consideration of the benefits to be derived therefrom, I do hereby pledge and agree to pay to the order of the Toledo, Ann Arbor & Northern Railroad Company the sum of one hundred dollars, payable in six months after the first cars run over the road from Ann Arbor to Toledo, payable on or before the above time specified, without interest.

Miles B.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Pulford v. Fire Department of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Wilcox v. Toledo & Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Montgomery v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Hewitt v. Wagar Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Daily v. MarshallMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API