Trask v. Karrick
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action of Contract on two promissory notes. Pleas, the general issue, special matter in defence, statute of limitations, and the bankruptcy of the defendant James L. Karrick. Heard on a referee’s report at'the September Term, 1918, Chittenden County, Slack, J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant Plenrietta Brewer Karrick, to which she excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The plaintiff seeks a recovery on two promissory notes. These were executed in Massachusetts, and were secured by a mortgage of real property in that state. They are dated April 2, 1894. One is for $5,000, and is payable October 1, 1894, with interest at five per cent. The other is for $20,000, *72and is payable in or within two years from April 1, 1894, with semi-annual interest at five per cent.. Both appear to be witnessed by James R. Carret, but, as will appear, the question whether they are to be regarded as witnessed notes is, as the case works out, immaterial. Interest was paid on these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. JamesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Draper v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Hackett v. KendallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
- Savings and Loan Soc. v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Stone v. HaskellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Motor & Industrial Finance Corporation v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Dieter v. ScottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Smith v. Vermont Marble CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Kleiman v. KolkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Marine Midland Bank v. BicknellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.